|
Health Canada Extends Avonex Labelling
to Include First Attack and Supporting MRI Data
Medical Update Memo
September 17, 2003
Health Canada has extended the labelling
of Avonex® (interferon beta-1a) to include people who experience
their first clinical episode and have supporting MRI-detected
brain lesions consistent with multiple sclerosis. The approval
was based on the “CHAMPS” study, published in 2000,
which involved 383 participants who had a single attack and
MRI lesions consistent with MS. People in this group would
be considered at high risk of developing clinically definite
MS. The study showed that Avonex can delay the onset of a second
attack, which would then be considered clinically definite
MS. It is expected that provincial governments and third-party
insurers will use the expanded labelling decision in considering
whether to reimburse the cost of Avonex for people with one
attack and supporting MRI data. Quebec is the only province
to reimburse on the basis of one attack and MRI-related brain
lesions. It reimburses for both Avonex and Rebif, another interferon
beta-1a.
Background
Health Canada has extended the labelling of
Avonex® (interferon beta-1a) to include people who experience
their first clinical episode and have supporting MRI-detected
brain lesions consistent with multiple sclerosis. The approval
was based on the “CHAMPS” study, (Controlled High
Risk Subjects Avonex Multiple Sclerosis Prevention Study) published
in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2000. The
study involved 383 participants considered to be “high
risk” in developing clinically definite MS. The study
took place at 50 MS research clinics in Canada and the United
States. Participants had one neurological sign – such
as optic neuritis – plus multiple clinically silent brain
lesions as shown on MRI. Participants were treated with standard
steroid drugs and then randomized to receive active treatment
or placebo. Active treatment was the usual, once-a-week dose
of Avonex injected into the muscle. (Avonex was approved in
Canada in 1998 for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS.)
After two years, the original three-year
CHAMPS study was stopped with the treated group having a slower
progression to clinically definite MS (the development of a
second neurological sign). The conversion to clinically definite
MS was reduced by 44% in the treated group compared to placebo.
In addition, treated participants had fewer new and enlarging
brain lesions as seen on MRI scans.
The diagnosis of clinically definite MS
requires two neurological events (attacks) suggesting loss
of myelin in the brain and spinal cord separated in time and
location. Studies have shown that people who have had a single
sign or symptom suggestive of demyelination and MRI-detected
brain lesions are at high risk of developing MS within several
years. People with similar neurological events but no evidence
of MRI-detected brain lesions are at relatively low risk for
developing clinically definite MS over the same time period.
It is expected that provincial governments
and third-party insurers will use the expanded labelling decision
in considering whether to reimburse the cost of Avonex for
people with one attack and supporting MRI data. At this time,
Quebec is the only province to reimburse on the basis of one
attack and MRI-related brain lesions. It reimburses for both
Avonex and Rebif, another interferon beta-1a. Health Canada
has not extended the labelling for Rebif.
Data from a study of Rebif® (interferon
beta-1a) called ETOMS (Early Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis)
was reported in 2000, at an American Academy of Neurology meeting.
The study involved 308 people with one neurological event and
MRI brain lesions suggestive of MS. They received active treatment
(the lower 22mcg dose of Rebif every other day injected under
the skin) or placebo for two years. The treated group had a
slower progression to clinically definite MS, with the conversion
reduced by 24%. In addition, treated participants had fewer
new and enlarging brain lesions.
The Health Canada decision on expanded labelling
for Avonex is supportive of a growing body of evidence that
early treatment has a positive impact in delaying a second
MS attack. In addition, many MS specialists believe early treatment
may reduce or even prevent the development of permanent clinical
disabilities.
National Research Department
National Communications & Social Action Department

Click
here to view or print this bulletin in its
original format.


Disclaimer
The Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada is an independent,
voluntary health agency and does not approve, endorse or
recommend any specific product or therapy but provides information
to assist individuals in making their own decisions.
|